CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE
How agencies and contractors deploy on ServLogi.
Three deployments, three different starting points. Each one inherited the same accredited baseline instead of building its own.
Customers below are described by sector and workload rather than by name. Most of our agency and cleared-contractor engagements restrict public attribution, and we do not name a customer without written authorization. Named references and the underlying figures are available under NDA during a briefing.
An 11-month path to a FedRAMP High ATO
A federal health agency needed to move a citizen-facing benefits portal off a legacy data center before an end-of-support deadline, with an authorization decision required inside a single fiscal year.
- Challenge Legacy hardware nearing end of support, hard fiscal-year ATO deadline
- Approach Migrated onto pre-accredited enclaves, inheriting the control baseline instead of assessing from zero
- Outcome Authorization to Operate granted in 11 months against a typical multi-year timeline
Dedicated capacity for AI workloads under IL5
A defense contractor running model training pipelines on shared public cloud hit resource contention during peak windows and needed dedicated capacity under DoD SRG IL5 without re-running its accreditation.
- Challenge Noisy-neighbor contention on shared GPU capacity during training runs
- Approach Moved to dedicated bare-metal hosts inside an IL5-accredited boundary already covering the contractor's other workloads
- Outcome Predictable training throughput with no separate authorization cycle for the new workload
SEC Rule 17a-4 retention without a bespoke build
A registered broker-dealer needed WORM-compliant retention for trading records under SEC Rule 17a-4 and did not want to build and maintain the storage layer in-house.
- Challenge SEC Rule 17a-4 requires immutable, time-stamped retention with an independent audit trail
- Approach Deployed onto ServLogi's SEC 17a-4 aligned storage tier with attestation already built into the platform
- Outcome Retention compliance in place at go-live, verified in the firm's next regulatory exam with no findings
Related publications
Accelerating FedRAMP High for SaaS Partners
How a commercial SaaS provider reached an authorization decision in eleven months by inheriting a boundary instead of building one.
Cloud Cryptography Standards
What FIPS 140-3 actually requires of a cloud provider, and why a validated module is not the same thing as a validated system.
All publications
White papers, threat intelligence, and engineering write-ups from the teams operating inside the ServLogi boundary.
Take the next step
These deployments started the same way, with a conversation about a specific workload and a specific deadline.
See it for your own workload
Bring your architecture and your authorization deadline. We will tell you what the move looks like from where you are.
Review the compliance baseline
The fourteen frameworks behind every engagement above, and which controls you would inherit rather than evidence yourself.
Read how a transition runs
The four phases between signature and go-live, and the nine workstreams our engineers cover alongside yours.